Comparison of Innovation Methodologies and TRIZ
Editor | On 21, Sep 2005
By: Gao Changqing, Huang Kezheng, Ma Fei
(E-mail address: email@example.com)
Abstract: Innovation is an eternal topic and has become more and more important in each domain. Many useful innovation methodologies are discussed and studied comprehensively. Based on the comparison and contrast of the strength and weakness between many common innovation methodologies and TRIZ, it is pointed that TRIZ is the most powerful systematic innovation methodology among them, especially in Mechatronics domain.
1. Innovation thinking
Innovation thinking means a breakthrough action, which can re-structure the related knowledge and
experience to get a brand new and valuable achievement. Innovation thinking process can be shown in Fig. 1.
Generally speaking, innovation thinking process is in a circle model. Based on the knowledge and experience, ‘primary information input’ can be transformed into ‘information output’ with innovation action ‘I’. ‘Rs’ means the ‘Result status’ of thinking. Then, in a innovation thinking circle, the following formula can be gotten.
Different innovation methodologies have different ways to organise the knowledge and experience and different methods to deal with the information input. From 1930s to 1980s, more than 300 innovation methodologies had appeared. Until today, there are some common methods for innovation applied in different domains, such as BS, 5W1H, Bionic association and TRIZ, etc. Each innovation methodology has its strength and weakness. It is a meaningful thing to know the characteristics of each method. The common innovation methods are introduced in details in this paper.
2. Innovation methodologies
2.1 BS (Brainstorming)
Brainstorming was put forward by Osborn. BS advocates that the persons in the symposium should express their ideas freely. BS points that tt is very helpful to break through psychological inertia to gain many valuable conceptions. There are four rules for BS, which are ‘Free association’, ‘Criticism-forbiddance’, ‘To improve quality by quantity’ and ‘To reform and improve the ideas continually’.By BS, the participators can exchange information and enlighten each other.
BS believes that innovation is a non-logical process. It depends on the participator’s intuition and inspiration. There is no essential rule for the inventing activities. The searching for the solutions to the problems depends on large quantity of possible ideas. The quantity of possible ideas is the premise for the possibility of gaining the solutions with good quality.
The process of solution-searching by BS can be seen in Fig. 2. BS requires the participators from the different domains. It is easy to get various possible solutions because of free association. But Optimized Solution is hard to find. BS can usually get Local Optimized Solution. And there are always lots of un-useful solutions produced during the solution-searching process.
Since its birth, BS has been applied widely in many domains, such as technology innovation, management, market innovation and invention and so on because of its easy operation and science. The operation procedure of BS can be divided into five steps. It can be seen in Fig. 3.
Example: Managers usually apply BS as an effective method to collect the employees’ valuable suggestions to reduce the cost.
2.2 5W1H (5W2H)
5W1H suggests that problem can be analyzed based on 6 aspects, which are Why, What, Who, When, Where and How. The essence of 5W1H is to analyze problem systematically, including the essence of the object (What), the essence of the subject (Who), the problem-existence ways in time and space (When, Where), the solution of the problem (How).
Basd on the improvement of 5W1H, ‘How’ can be divided into ‘How to’ and ‘How much’. ‘How to’ means the way to resolve the problem. ‘How much’ means the degree of the problem-resolving. Then it is called 5W2H. The meanings of 5W2H are listed in Table 1.
The procedure of 5W2H can follow the steps:
1. Analyse the problem in 7 aspects
* Why is innovation needed? [Why]
* What is the object of the innovation? [Where]
* Who undertakes the innovation task? [Who]
* When to achieve the innovation? [When]
* Where is the place to start the task? [Where]
* How to deal with the problem? [How to]
* How much to resolve the problem? [How much]
2. List the questions
3. Discuss the questions to search the solution
Example: There was a store on the second floor of an aviation company building. And its sale was bad. The manager used 5w1H to find that ‘Who’ and ‘Where’ were the reasons for bad sale status. Most clients of the store are the passengers. And most of them leave the aviation company by the gate on the first floor. The second floor is not a necessary place to pass. So the store moved to the first floor near the gate and the sale became better.
2.3 Bionic Association
Various organisms have evolved on the earth for about 5 billion years. They keep up changing their modality and function to meet the requirement of the nature to survive on the evolvement journey. In many aspects, organisms are very good examples to help human being to find a correct way to resolve the problems.
As a kind of innovation methodology, bionic association means that human being observe the organisms’ behavior and use the organisms system as a reference to establish the artificial technology system to resolve the problems.
Bionic association can produce high-level innovation ideas. At present, the performance of most bionic-rtificial technology system can’t reach the level of the corresponding organisms system.
Bionic association can be achieved by the following steps:
* Observe the organisms’ behavior carefully. Take the phenomena of the organisms as the association objects.
* Analyse the mechanism of the phenomena of the organisms system.
* Analyse the practical problem. Develop a bionic idea into a problem-solving method or product.
Example: Based on multi-eye of grasshopper, a special camera is developed, which can take thousands of pictures synchronously.
2.4 Combination Method
Combination innovation is to combine more than two technology elements together and get a new
product. Those technology elements are usually substance unit, technics, principles, structures, functions and so on.
Because the existing technology elements have been applied in different domains, combination of those technology elements is a method with large possibility. The idea from combination innovation is more feasible. According to the characteristics of combination innovation, it can be classified into 6 types.
They are listed below.
*Technology combination. It means to combine the different technology elements to get a new performance of a product.
* Material combination. Different materials are combined together to get a new material with new character. The new material always can meet the new engineering requirement.
8 Product combination. More than two products are combined to get a new product with more functions.
* Suit combination. In order to get a new portable product, the products with different standards can be combined based on the structure re-design.
* Function combination. Many different functions are combined together to get a new product with multi-function.
* Structure combination. Based on the structure re-combination, a new product with compound function can be gotten.
Example: A special alloy with shape-memory function can be gotten with the combination of ‘titanium’ and ‘nickel’.
2.5 Reverse Innovation
Based on the analysis of existing product, a new product can be designed by improving the example product. This kind of innovation method is called reverse innovation.
Reverse innovation is employed widely in Japan and Korea. It is a very effective method sometimes.
2.6 Technology Transplant
Transplanting an advanced technology of one domain into the other domains or transplanting an advanced technology of one product into the other products to get a new product with wonderful performance. This kind of innovation method is called technology transplant.
Example: Transplant laser technology of military use into the civil use. Laser cutting machine is a product by technology transplant.
TRIZ (the Russian acronym for the theory) is the knowledge-based, systematic approach to innovation. Developed in the former Soviet Union by Genrich S. Altshuller (1926-1998) and his school, TRIZ methods are drawn from analysis of the most innovative inventions in different industries, technologies, and fields of engineering.
It began in 1946 when the Russian engineer and scientist Genrich Altshuller discovered that the evolution of a technical system is not a random process, but is governed by certain objective laws. These laws can be used to consciously develop a system along its path of technical evolution.
TRIZ involves a systematic analysis of the system to be improved and the application of a series of guidelines for problem definition. TRIZ classifies innovative problems and offers corresponding problem-solving methods for each class of problem. It can provide some useful tools for us to analyze the problem, including Ideal Final Result, Laws of Engineering System Evolution, Altshuller’s Matrix, Separation Principle, 76 standard solutions, Effects, etc.
4. Comparison and contrast of different innovation methodologies
Through the comparison and contrast of different innovation methodologies, it is clear to see that TRIZ is a more systematic innovation methodology than others. Knowledge base support is a very important factor for the innovation process. As an innovation method, only TRIZ have systematic Effects library for inventing. And TRIZ provide systematic problem-analysis tools. Because its ideas for invention usually come from the analysis of patents and Effects, it is easy to translating an innovation idea into practise.
Currently, TRIZ is widely applied in technology domain for product innovation, especially for mechanical, electronic and constructional domains. The application of TRIZ in management and economy is relatively weak.
After more than 50-year-development, TRIZ is employed widely in the world. Contrary to other innovation methods, TRIZ is more practical with good operation.
Sometimes, other methods can be used with TRIZ together.
1. Wang Rui-fang, Chen Jian-ping, Zhou Gui-ying. The research on innovation design thinking of mechanical product. MECHANICAL RESEARCH & APPLICATION, 2004, 17 (4): 14~15
2. Wang Ji-qiang, Wen Zheng-zhong, Sun Hua-li. The comparison of innovation design methodologies—TRIZ and BS. Mechanical manufacturing, 2003, 41 (463): 7~9
3. Li Yan, Wang Jie, Li Xiang-long, et al. Creative Thinking and Computer Aided Product Innovation. Compter Integrated Manufacturing Systems, 2003, 9 (12): 1092~1096
4. Liu Ying, Ai Hong. The thinking and technology of innovation design. Beijing: CHINA MACHINE PRESS, January 2004.
5. Qiu Zhi-zhen. Future of mechanical engineering and bionics. J. of Anhui University of Technology, 2002, 19 (3): 230~232
6. Wang Wei, Ma Yi-wen. COMBINING INNOVATION FOR PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT: THEORY AND CASE STUDY. Journal of Industrial Engineering/Engineering Management, 1997, 11 (Supp 1): 39~44
7. Yang Zong-de. Creative thinking methods for innovation design. MECHANICAL RESEARCH & APPLICATION, 2001, 14 (Supp), August: 52~54
8. Genrich Altshuller, The Innovation Algorithm, Technical Innovation Center, INC. WORCESTER, MA, 2000.
9. Terninko, J The QFD, TRIZ and Taguchi Connection: Customer-Driven Robust Innovation. The Ninth Symposium on Quality Function Deployment, June 10, 1997
10. Gao Changqing, Huang Kezheng, Zhang Yong. Creative conceptual design ideas can be gotten with TRIZ methodology. TRIZ Journal, http://www.triz-journal.com, June 2005
11. Yoshiki Nakamura. The effective use of TRIZ with Brainstorming. TRIZ Journal, http://www.triz-journal.com, February, 2001